I’m going to tell you about a hand I played in a $100 tournament in Las Vegas which didn’t quite work out. I remember it now because I just heard about another hand played recently by a famous player in the European WSOP which ended in glorious failure. I think there is a lesson to be learned from both of these hands.
First of all, here’s my hand from the summer of 2008. Like I said, it happened in a $100 tournament in Las Vegas, in Binions Horseshoe. It was about 45 minutes in and I hadn’t got any cards at all so I’d just been folding for the most part and had a tight image. I had about 2200 chips from a starting stack of 2500 and the blinds were 50-100
I got dealt 62 unsuited on the button (don’t you just love poker stories which begin with “I got dealt 62 offsuit”?) There was one limper in the seat before me but he had been limping a lot and I had seen him limp and fold previously, so I raised him to 350 hoping that I would knock out the blinds, he would fold and I would take down the 250 which was in the pot. Sure enough the blinds folded and it was back to the limper. Unfortunately for me he called the raise so two of us went to the flop, with him first to act. The pot was 850.
The flop was A K K rainbow.
Ooops. Not so good for my 62 offsuit, but then again, it wasn’t ever really going to be was it?
He checked and it was my turn to act. Now if I had a king here I would usually check but as I was so weak I wanted to end the hand now. I didn’t want him believing that I didn’t have an ace or king, which he might do if I checked behind him. So I put in a small, suspicious looking bet. The idea was to make him think I had the king and that I wanted a call – at which point he wouldn’t play ball and he would fold. Well that was the plan anyway, so I bet 300.
Of course, he could easily be slow playing me with a king himself so I studied him hard to get some information on him. He thought about it for a while and then called. To my mind, he really was thinking about something, genuinely thinking as opposed to giving it the Hollywood act. I decided that he didn’t have a king because if he did, he wouldn’t be thinking so hard. Now I put him on a weak ace and I figured he was asking himself whether in fact I had a king when he was doing his thinking. The pot was now 1450.
The turn was a seven for AKK7. He checked again. Now I decided it was time to back myself. If he didn’t have a king, and I was pretty sure he didn’t, he wouldn’t be able to call my all in here. If he did have a king well then good luck to him – he’s just made a real mug out of me.
“All in”, I said and fired a third barrel with my junk hand. He thought long and hard. The pot was 1450 plus the 1650 I just put in. 3100 total and it was 1650 to call. He had me covered, but only just. If he lost he was ruined.
Then he said a phrase which I heard a few times on that trip and which I grew to hate because it always meant I was about to lose: “If ya got me, ya got me” and he called.
He turned over AJ and I sheepishly showed my lowly 62 offsuit, looking for the nearest exit. The players at the table all looked at me like I was completely insane. “Did this tourist really just bluff three times with 6 high?”
Well yes I did. I walked away laughing to myself at how ridiculous that must have looked. It’s times like that when you think “why did I just do that? I could have just waited for a real hand to play”. The other players carried on looking at me in disbelief, and perhaps a bit of disgust, but definitely not amusement. I was a bit narked that they clearly thought so little of me but it’s hardly the time or the place to try to explain my thought processes! I had made a great read that he didn’t have a king and backed it with my entire stack. To me, my opponent made a bad call. How could he call that without a king? Ha ha, yes, he just made a rubbish winning call.
Now let’s look at the second hand. This was played at the WSOP Europe in September 2009 and both players were doing well with stacks of over 250,000 chips. I’m going to keep one player’s identity secret until the end of the hand and to make things interesting I’m not going to tell you what his hand was either.
Player X raised to 3000 from two off the button with his mystery hand and Ian Munn, an amateur from England, reraised to 9000 with Ah7s. Player X called and they went to the flop.
The flop was AdAc3c
Player X was first to act and he checked. Munns’ bet 9000 on the flop and player X raised him to 58,000. Munns made the minimum re-raise to 116,000 with his A-7 and player X shoved all in over the top. If Munns called and lost he would have been crippled. He thought for about 20 seconds.
What would you do in this spot? Player X has check-raised you and when you raised him back he shoved all in pretty much immediately. Remember that it is the WSOP and you still have about 150 big blinds left if you fold. What I’m trying to suggest to you here is that it is a fold, a clear fold, an easy fold. You’ve made it so obvious that you have an ace that you could practically show player X your ace. Player X knows that you have an ace yet he has still moved all in. You have a seven kicker remember.
And if you think back over the betting, pocket threes is a distinct possibility. He raised preflop and just called your re-raise (I think that’s an awful play with A7 by the way). Now he is check-raising on the flop.
Well as it happens, if you’d folded you’d have been wrong to do so. Player X had Kd2d. Yep, that’s right, no pair and only the slightest flicker of a draw (running diamonds). Player X did all that aggro while being a 4% favourite to win the hand.
And the player’s identity? It was an 18 year old Viktor Blom, the person rumoured to operate under the Isildur1 moniker online. (If you hadn’t heard of him before, Isildur1 appeared in November 2009 and went on a 7 million dollar winning run, before losing the lot late last year). I’m not saying that Isildur1 is Viktor Blom because I don’t know for sure. But let’s say for the sake of argument that it is him. And let’s also say for the sake of argument that you wanted to know what sort of moves a player who can make $7 million online in a month makes. Well this is one of them. If like me, you couldn’t have made that move, then fair enough –it’s no disgrace. Viktor Blom is out of our league.
You can see the full clip of the hand here, just so long as you promise to press the “back” button to get back to this page: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQ-aaWUzzZQ
I thought this was an amazingly ballsy, brilliant bluff. It deserved to work and it should have worked. What realistic hands could Blom have held that Munns was beating? Only A6 A5 A4 and A2, plus a stone bluff, which was unlikely really given the betting (despite actually being true). Interestingly, Munns said afterwards “he didn’t even have a flush draw”, so I reckon that is what Munns put him on.
Mohammed Ali used to say you couldn’t feint a sucker. A good opponent would take evasive action and position himself where Ali wanted him - to be teed up for a haymaker. But the sucker won’t move there because he isn’t good enough to spot the feint. I’m certainly not suggesting that Ian Munns is a “sucker”, but I think if he had been a more sophisticated player he would have thought more deeply about it and convinced himself to fold.
Notice how the players at the table are laughing at what they have just seen. But Todd Brunson admits that “it would have worked on me”. This is telling - Brunson is a far better poker player than Ian Munns and he admitted the bluff would have worked (between laughs of course, because it is just so funny to see a bluff go so spectacularly wrong).
Well I’ve gone on about these two hands for a bit now but there is a moral to the story. In fact there are two things to take from these hands. First of all, when you run a bluff – make it look genuine. Blom kept going with the all in shove. That he held K2, QQ or 34 was irrelevant -he was playing his opponent’s hand, not his own, and he thought he could get him to fold. Blom kept up the act and shoved all in over the top, a move which Brunson admitted would have worked on him. (Personally, if I were Blom, I would have lost my bottle when Ian Munns min raised on the flop, but then again if I were Munns I would have folded when Blom put in the check-raise).
The other moral is be careful who you bluff. You ought to be pretty sure that the player is at least capable of folding what you think he is holding. And obviously, never bluff a known calling station.
Blom picked the wrong man. As the saying goes, he made the right move but at the wrong time. And it was the same with me in Vegas when I fired three barrels with my 62. Not that it was in Blom’s league or in a big tournament, but the principle was the same. See I ought to have known better. The guy was in his 50s and was a tourist himself. I knew that because I overheard him talking with another player as we were waiting to start. He also said that he rarely played poker. In short he was a novice. I put him on an ace and I ought to have known a novice wouldn’t have folded an ace. Nice move – wrong man.
One last thing - don’t be scared of looking like a fool. If you are, you’ve probably got no future in this game.